A Continuous Quality Improvement Tool for School-Based Health Centers
Introduction:
School-based health centers (SBHCs) are designed
to detect and address the significant health problems and health
risks of each age group among school-age children, i.e. elementary,
middle or junior high, and senior high students. A comprehensive
annual risk assessment (and biennial physical exam) is essential
to detecting and addressing all important health concerns of the
students at each level of school. Within each age group there
are certain conditions that stand out because they represent typical
health risks for that age and because they may serve as a measure
of good health care delivered. This chart presents seven "Sentinel
Conditions" for each school age group.
It is important to highlight several points about
the sentinel conditions. First the sentinel conditions are clinically
based. That is, they represent those conditions of health commonly
encountered and treatable in a SBHC setting. Next, a limited number
of conditions were chosen for several reasons. It allows each
health center to focus on a meaningful evaluation. It facilitates
local and national comparisons between sites and it allows for
additions and changes to the list of conditions in future years
as success is achieved with the initial measures.
Thus the list of sentinel conditions is purposefully
not comprehensive. Rather, they are intended to be the "core measure"
of quality in school-based health centers. It is understood that
SBHCs will be subject to quality measures from other sources and
agencies and depending on the services provided (e.g. dental,
prenatal, well child care). For these added services, additional
quality measures will necessarily be developed and applied.
The sentinel condition column identifies the
sentinel condition to be monitored. The reference column includes
references that support the inclusion of the condition and act
as references to access for best practices on diagnosing and treating
the condition. Resources are the minimum requirements (policies,
equipment, information, relationships) that need to be in place
in order to provide clinical services relative to the condition.
The markers column describes the data to be collected from the
medical record in order to evaluate the quality of care for the
sentinel condition. The final column is the marker column and
it is the score assigned to the data gathered from the medical
record review. The measurement scale from 1 to 5 is designed with
a value of 3 as the threshold or minimum standard of care. A score
of 1 or 2 is below threshold and 4 or 5 are above threshold.
The foundation for each age grouping is an annual
risk assessment and a biennial physical examination for registered
students. The risk assessment may be conducted several ways including
with student completed paper and pencil assessment forms, computerized
assessment forms, interviews by the SBHC staff done separately
from the physical examination and interviews done by the provider
the time of physical examination. They can be conducted on an
individual basis or in as part of classroom screenings. The SBHC
may construct its own form or may elect to use forms that have
been developed by nationally recognized organizations such as
the AMA's GAPS.
Each SBHC will need to determine how it prefers
to operate however, there are come guidelines to keep in mind
especially for those programs that elect to design their own materials.
The biennial history and physical examination should be thorough
and should include in addition to a history of current complaints
and review of systems, a past medical history, family history,
and behavioral/developmental history. The physical should include
height, weight, blood pressure, vision screen, physical assessment
of all systems, and appropriate laboratory testing. An annual
risk assessment that is developmentally appropriate is expected
to cover: injury, safety, and violence, diet and exercise, dental,
substance use and passive exposure, abuse, family relationships,
school, friends, mood and emotional health, and sexuality. The
risk assessment can be incorporated into the biennial physical
or done separately but should be included in the registrants medical
record.
CQI
Version 1 September 1, 2001
|
Sentinel Conditions
Elementary School
|
References
|
Resources
|
Markers
|
Measurement
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual risk assessment
2
Biennial
physical exam
|
Bright
Futures
HEDIS
AAP
USPHSTF
PPIP
|
Physical space is adequate
for confidential screening/exams;
Medical record forms available
Permission by parent
or other responsible adult
|
% of charts with record
of both annual risk assessment and biennial physical exam |
1= 0-25% of charts
with both markers documented
2= 26-50% "
3= 51-75% "
4= 76-95% "
5= >95% "
|
| Asthma, Chronic
|
AAAAI
NHLBI
AAP
|
Asthma plan
Peak flow meter
Primary care physician
Parental permission
|
% of students with asthma plan
% of visits in "green zone"
or
(*) % of students who are stable
(no symptoms of cough or wheeze, improved lung function, reduction
in number of severe attacks, minimized sleep disturbance, and improved
attendance in school, and reduction in number of hospitalizations) |
1= 0-40% of charts have
asthma plan
2= 41-60% "
3= 61 -100%"
4= Above plus 50-75% of visits show the student in green zone
or stable
5= Above plus >75% of visits show student in green zone or
stable |
| Incomplete Immunizations
|
AAP Red Book
State Registries
Local Health Department
|
List of required immunization
by state
Educational material for parents
Parent permission
Chart form for immunization
records
Policy for tracking students
with incomplete immunizations
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance
Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
|
% of students behind
in recommended intervals for immunizations for school entry who
are brought up to date
|
1=
0-25% of records show that students behind in recommended intervals
for immunizations required for school entry are brought up to
date
2= 26-50% "
3= 51-75% "
4= 76-95% "
5= >95% " |
| High Risk for Unintentional
Injury
|
Bright Futures
AAP
CDC
Safe Students
Children's Safety Network
PPIP
|
Screening questions in
history form
Primary prevention aides for
students, parents
List of community resources
Planned school-wide health
and safety promotional events
|
% of students at risk
for helment and seatbelt injury who have injury prevention materials
sent home to family; or documentation that student received instruction
regarding risk reduction
|
1=
0-25% show evidence of prevention materials sent home or student
education
2= 26-50% "
3= 51-75% "
4= 76-95% "
5= >95% " |
|
Poor school performance
|
Bright Futures Mental
Health
DSM-PC
|
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance
Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
Identified list of
performance indicators from school: dropping grades, failing 2
or more classes, suspension from school, skipping school, trouble
getting homework done, lack of interest
Name of school
academic counselor for each student
Information
regarding absences and discipline
|
% of students
at risk for school failure are assessed for medical and mental
health problems
% of students
with school failure with plan, referral and follow-up
|
1=
0-50% of charts show record of medical and mental evaluation
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 50-75% have evidence of plan, and referral for academic
services
5= Above plus >75% " |
|
Sentinel Conditions
Elementary School
|
References
|
Resources
|
Markers
|
Measurement 1
|
Mental Health
3
Students being
treated for ADHD
|
AAP
AHCPR
DSM-PC
NIMH |
Knowledge of treatment
plan from provider
Knowledge of student
performance
School IEP
Medication log
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance
Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty |
% of charts with documentation
of treatment plan
% of charts with documentation
of compliance with and effectiveness of the treatment plan |
1= 0-20% of
charts with plan
2= 21-50% of charts with plan
3=>50% of charts with plan
4= Above plus 50% of charts with compliance check and effectiveness
evaluation
5= Above plus >50% of charts with compliance check and effectiveness
evaluation |
| Child Abuse
|
State regulations
School policy
AAP
Guidelines for professional
disciplines
|
Policy regarding reporting
suspected child abuse
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance
Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
Legal reporting requirements
Local resources
Child Abuse Quarterly Medical
Update
Institute for Professional
Education
|
% of students at risk are reported
to appropriate agencies
% of students who receiving
ongoing case management (for those who remain at school)
|
1= 0-50% of students
identified are connected to appropriate agency
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% of students identified are connected to appropriate agency
4= Above plus 50-75% of students remaining in school are receiving
ongoing case management
5= Above plus >75% of students remaining " |
|
Sentinel Conditions
Middle/Junior High
|
References
|
Resources
|
Markers
|
Measurement
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual risk assessment
2
biennial
physical exam
|
Bright Futures
HEDIS
AAP
USPHSTF
PPIP
GAPS
|
Physical space is adequate for
confidential screening/exams;
Medical record forms available
Parental permission documented
Parent or other responsible adult
present
Policy on adolescent confidentiality
and receipt of health services
|
% of charts with record
of both annual risk assessment and biennial physical examination
|
1= 0-25% of charts
with both markers documented
2= 26-50% "
3= 51-75% "
4= 76-95% "
5= >95% " |
| Tobacco Use
|
USPHS Clinical Practice
Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use & Dependence
in
JAMA
ALA
AMA
AAP
ETR
PPIP
|
Age appropriate screen
Policy on adolescent confidentiality
and receipt of health services
Treatment plan or referral for
treatment
Names of school substance abuse
resources and community resources
Information about prevention
for parents
Planned school-wide health promotion
events
|
% receiving intervention (treatment
or referral)
% adherent to intervention plan
% cessation
|
1= 0-50% receive intervention
2= 51-95% receive intervention
3= >95% receive intervention
4= Above plus 50% compliant with plan
5= Above plus 1-20% report smoking cessation |
| Risk of Pregnancy
|
GAPS
Bright Futures
AMA
Planned Parenthood
SEICUS
PPIP
ETR
|
Staff expertise with
adolescent pregnancy prevention
Policy on adolescent
confidentiality
Patient health education materials
Family Planning services
on site or referral for service
|
% of sexually active students
with prevention plan
% of sexually active students
with documented risk reduction
|
1= 0-50% of at risk
students have documented prevention plan
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 1-50% of charts have documented a risk reduction
5= Above plus >50% of charts have documented a risk reduction |
| Poor school performance
|
Bright Futures Mental
Health
DSM-PC
|
Policy regarding
communication and collaboration with School Administration,
School Nurse, Guidance Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist
and Faculty
Identified
list of performance indicators from school: dropping grades,
failing 2 or more classes, suspension from school, skipping
school, trouble getting homework done, lack of interest
Name of school
academic counselor for each student
Information
regarding absences and discipline
|
% of students at risk
for school failure are assessed for medical and mental health
problems
% of students with school
failure with plan, referral and follow-up
|
1=
0-50% of charts show record of medical and mental evaluation
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 50-75% have evidence of plan, and referral for academic
services
5= Above plus >75% " |
|
Sentinel Conditions
Middle/Junior High
|
References
|
Resources/Tools
|
Markers
|
Measurement
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent-child conflict
|
Bright Futures
GAPS
DSM-PC
|
Policy regarding confidentiality
List of community resources and
agencies for families
On-site support for mental health
Medical and mental health evaluation
for contributing factors (e.g., chemical use, family chemical use, physical
abuse, depression, etc.)
"Family Conflict Scale"
Screen for co-morbidities
|
% of students with history of
parent child conflict are evaluated and assessed for contributing factors
and co morbidities
% of students with history of
parent child conflict have a plan to address problem
% of students showing reduction
of conflict
|
1= 0-50% evaluated
and assessed
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus >75% have a plan
5= Above plus >35% show reduction in conflict |
|
Mental Health
3
Students being treated for ADHD
|
AAP
AHCPR
DSM-PC
NIMH
|
Knowledge of treatment plan from
provider
Knowledge of student performance
School IEP
Medication log
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance Counselor,
Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
|
% of charts with documentation
of treatment plan
% of charts with documentation
of compliance with and effectiveness of the treatment plan
|
1= 0-20% of charts with plan
2= 21-50% of charts with plan
3= >50% of charts with plan
4= Above
plus 1-50% of charts with compliance check and effectiveness evaluation
5= Above plus >50% of charts
with compliance check and effectiveness evaluation |
| At Risk for Depression
|
GAPS
DSM-PC
AHCPR
SAMHSA
|
Teen confidentiality
Pediatric Symptom Checklist
Access to resources for full
mental health evaluation
Psychiatric referral
|
% with completed evaluation,
referral & plan
% of showing improvement
|
1=
0-50% with completed evaluation, referral and plan
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 25%-%50 show improvement
5= Above plus >50% show improvement |
|
Sentinel Conditions
High School
|
References
|
Resources
|
Markers
|
Measurement
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
risk assessment 2
biennial
physical exam
|
Bright Futures
HEDIS
AAP
USPHSTF
PPIP
GAPS
HEADSS
|
Physical space is adequate for
confidential screening/exams;
Medical record forms available
Parental permission documented
Policy on adolescent confidentiality
and receipt of health services
|
% of charts with record
of both annual risk assessment and biennial physical exam
|
1=
0-25% of charts with both markers documented
2= 26-50% "
3=51-75% "
4= 76-95% "
5= >95% " |
| Alcohol use
|
GAPS
NIDA
SAMHSA
AAP
ETR
PPIP
USPHSTF
|
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance Counselor,
Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
Policy on adolescent confidentiality
and receipt of health services
Names of school and community
substance abuse
Referral relationship with substance
abuse programs
Information about prevention
for parents
Screening tool (ie CAGE, AUDIT)
Screen for co morbidities
|
% of students using alcohol
who are evaluated for abuse
% of students at high
risk for abuse with intervention plan, or referral
% with reduced risk or reduced
abuse
|
1=
0-50% evaluated for abuse
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 50% of those evaluated with evidence of intervention
plan or referral
5= Above plus 10% report drinking cessation |
| Risk of Personal Violence
|
CDC
Hamilton Fish Institute
SAMHSA
PPIP
GAPS
|
List of categories of violence
to be prevented eg, rape, abuse, weapons, fighting, gangs, suspension,
arrest
Primary prevention aides for
students, parents
List of community resources
|
% of those at risk with evaluation
and plan
% with reduced risk
|
1=
0-50% with intervention, plan and referral
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 25%-50% reduced risk
5= Above plus >50% reduced risk |
| Risk of STI
|
GAPS
CDC Guidelines
IOM
PPIP
|
Protocols for diagnoses
and treatment of STIs
On site resources for
diagnosis & prescription of STI
Referral resources for further
evaluation & treatment |
% with appropriate assessment
& treatment
% with documented risk reduction
|
1=
0-50% with appropriate assessment and treatment
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 25%-50% report reduced risk at next visit
5= Above plus >50% report reduced risk at next visit |
|
Sentinel Conditions
High School
|
References
|
Resources/Tools
|
Markers
|
Measurement
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poor school performance
|
Bright Futures Mental
Health
DSM-PC
|
Policy regarding
communication and collaboration with School Administration,
School Nurse, Guidance Counselor, Social Worker, School Psychologist
and Faculty
Identified
list of performance indicators from school: dropping grades,
failing 2 or more classes, suspension from school, skipping
school, trouble getting homework done, lack of interest
Name of
school academic counselor for each student
Information
regarding absences and discipline
|
% of students at risk
for school failure are assessed for medical and mental health
problems
% of students with school
failure with plan, referral and follow-up
|
1=
0-50% of charts show record of medical and mental evaluation
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 50-75% have evidence of plan, and referral for academic
services
5= Above plus >75% " |
|
Mental Health
3
Students being treated for ADHD
|
AAP
AHCPR
DSM-PC
NIMH
|
Knowledge of treatment plan from
provider
Knowledge of student performance
School IEP
Medication log
Policy regarding communication
and collaboration with School Administration, School Nurse, Guidance Counselor,
Social Worker, School Psychologist and Faculty
|
% of charts with documentation
of treatment plan
% of charts with documentation
of compliance with and effectiveness of the treatment plan
|
1= 0-20% of charts with plan
2= 21-50% of charts with plan
3= >50% of charts with plan
4= Above plus 50% of charts
with compliance check and effectiveness evaluation
5= Above
plus >50% of charts with compliance check and effectiveness evaluation |
| At Risk for Depression
|
GAPS
DSM-PC
AHCPR
SAMHSA
|
Teen confidentiality
Pediatric Symptom Checklist
Access to resources for
full mental health evaluation
Psychiatric referral
|
% with completed evaluation,
referral & plan
% showing improvement
|
1=
0-50% with completed evaluation, referral and plan
2= 51-95% "
3= >95% "
4= Above plus 25%-50% show improvement
5= Above plus >50% show improvement |
1 Scale of markers: 1 and 2= below threshold; 3=at threshold;
4 and 5= above threshold
2 Annual Risk Assessment and results of Biennial Physical
Exam should be in the chart by the third visit.
3 Each program should choose one of the two Mental Health conditions
for evaluation. |
Elementary
School Data Collection Form | Middle School Data Collection
Form | High School Data Collection Form
Return to Continuous quality improvement (CQI) for SBHCs